Uncategorized

Punjab-Haryana High Court Nathu Ram vs Charano @ Charanjit Kaur And Ors on 10 August, 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. SAO No.47 of 2014 (O&M)             Date of Decision: 10.08.2017 Nathu Ram                                     …..Appellant       Vs Charano @ Charanjit Kaur and ors                                               ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH The trial Court further held that the Handwriting Expert further gave the opinion that thumb impression at Mark Q1 on interim order dated 31.10.1992 differ from the thumb impression at Mark Q2 to Q6. Therefore, as per the opinion of the Handwriting Expert even in the case titled as Nathu Ram vs. Charno, two different person on two different occasion were impersonated as Charno in the Court. The trial Court on the aforesaid parameters, dismissed the suit vide the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2011. Feeling aggrieved against the same, an appeal was filed before the lower Appellate Court. [5]. The lower Appellate Court held that though the plaintiff had examined PW-2 Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting and Fingerprint Expert, who opined that the disputed signature on written statement does not tally with the admitted signatures/standard signatures of Charano. In such like circumstances, Sh. Amar Singh Bhullar, Advocate who is a material witness can identify the plaintiff in order to dispel any suspicion and can also prove the allegations of the plaintiff. Since Sh. Amar Singh Bhullar, Advocate has not been examined, therefore, the application under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC for grant of permission to lead additional evidence was allowed in order to enable the Court to pronounce the judgment effectively. The application was allowed 4 of 7 for substantial cause. The satisfaction was recorded by the lower Appellate Court that the additional evidence so prayed by the appellant would enable the Court to pronounce the judgment and is necessary for advancing the substantial cause of justice. [6]. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently contended that the plaintiff did not lead any evidence in affirmative so as to dispel the alleged cloud on the decree dated 12.03.1993. Issue No.7-A specifically was wide enough to cover the issue of alleged decree being fraudulent. Once the plaintiff did not lead any evidence in affirmative, she was not entitled to lead any additional evidence at appellate stage as she was not entitled to fill lacuna in the present case. Learned counsel relied upon Youdhister vs. Siri Ram and others, 1996(3) R.C.R. (Civil) 706. [7]. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. [8]. PW-2 Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting and Fingerprint Expert has given his opinion to the following effect:- “The disputed thumb impression Mark Q1 is different from the other disputed thumb impressions Mark-Q2 to Q6. The disputed thumb impressions Mark-Q1 to Q-6 are different from the standard/specimen thumb impressions of Charno Mark R1 to R5 (R.T.I.) & L1, L2 (L.T.I.) i.e. disputed thumb impressions Mark-Q1 to Q6 are not affixed by the ladies, who affixed specimen thumb impressions Mark R1 to R5 5 of 7 (R.T.I.) & L1, L2 (L.T.I.).”

(THIS JUDGEMENT RELATES TO CASE OF FRAUDULENT ADDITION/ALTERATION) Punjab-Haryana High Court Saraj Singh @ Bittu Diary Wala vs Kewal Krishan on 28 September, 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.              CRR 3906-2016 (O&M)                 Date of decision: 28.09.2017 Saraj Singh @ Bittu Diary Wala             …..Petitioner                                     versus Kewal Krishan                               ……Respondent CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh In addition to the going through the report of the Handwriting and Finger Prints Expert, I have myself gone through the disputed cheque. A perusal of the cheque shows that the date on the cheque is with a different ink. The name of the drawee complainant and the amount mentioned in the words is with the same handwriting. The signatures of the accused are in the same ink which was used for filling the date on the cheque. It is clear to the naked eyes that before the digits 40,000/-, digit ‘1’ has been added with a slightly different ink. There was no reason for the lower Court to discard the opinion of the expert, particularly, when the said addition is visible to the naked eyes. In this case, there was no requirement to take the specimen handwriting of anybody, since the addition is of one stroke which is not comparable by taking specimen handwriting of anybody. The reasoning given by Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting and Finger Prints Expert is quite convincing. Therefore, it has to be held that before digits 40,000/-, in the amount box of the cheque, digit ‘1’ was added later on.

Criminal Appeal No.1731-SB of 2003                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Criminal Appeal No.1731-SB of 2003        Decided on 9 .12.2009. Raghu Nath Bansal                          …… Appellant. Versus State of Punjab                             …. Respondent. CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.C. PURI Present :-   Mr. J.S.Brar, Advocate for the appellant.              Mr. Sudhir Nehra, Addl.A.G, Punjab. When asked to enter upon his defence, he produced Anil Kumar Gupta Handwriting and Finger Prints Expert, Fazilka (DW-1), Sadhu Ram (DW-2), Harpal Singh, Revenue Accountant (DW-3) and Balraj (DW-4), Krishan Lal Narang (DW-5), Constable Joginder Singh (DW-6), Jag Singh LDC, PSEB, Sub Division, Doda (DW-7). In the present case, the charge framed against the appellant is that he demanded and accepted illegal gratification for changing and releasing electricity connection in the name of Malkiat Singh from the name of his father Joginder Singh. However, the evidence led by the prosecution does not support the said fact but was in respect of change of the dead meter only. Ex.PA is the basis of the prosecution in which Joginder Singh through Malkiat Singh had made a request that meter at their premises to be changed as it was lying dead. No request has been made in this application that meter be changed in the name of Malkiat Singh from the original consumer Joginder Singh, his father. No doubt, the charge can be amended at any stage but in view of the above circumstances discussed above, it would not be inconsonance of justice to amend the charge after period of fifteen years and in view of the evidence produced by the prosecution. In view of the above discussion the appeal stands allowed and the impugned judgment of the learned trial Court stands set aside and the accused stands acquitted by giving him benefit of doubt. A copy of this judgment be sent to the trial Court for strict compliance.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Kailash Chand vs M/S Mangaliawala Traders on 3 January, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Case No.: R.S.A.No.3 of 2012  Date of Decision : 03.01.2012             Kailash Chand                  ….   Appellant                                 Vs.             M/s Mangaliawala Traders       ….   Respondent * * * L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) : I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the case file. Plaintiff’s Proprietor Subhash Chand himself appeared in the witness-box as PW-1 and examined Handwriting Expert Anil Kumar Gupta as PW-2 and also examined plaintiff’s Accountant Ram Niwas as PW-4. Plaintiff and Ram Niwas broadly stated according to the plaint allegations. Anil Kumar Gupta – handwriting expert reported that the disputed bahi entries bear signatures of the defendant. I have carefully considered the aforesaid contentions, but find myself unable to accept the same. Plaintiff has led cogent and sufficient evidence to prove its case. The plaintiff’s Proprietor himself appeared in the witness-box and examined his Accountant, who had authored the disputed bahi entries. Both of them have proved the said bahi entries bearing signatures of the defendant and also proved advancement of different amounts, as pleaded in the plaint. Their statements are also corroborated by handwriting expert Anil Kumar Gupta (PW-2). On the other hand, there is self serving oral statement of the defendant, which is not sufficient to rebut the plaintiff’s cogent evidence.

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT Before :- R. Subhash Reddy, J. Civil Revision Petition Nos. 314 and 317 of 2013. D/d. 14.06.2013. Rytu Depot, Draksharamam, East Godavari District and other – Petitioner Versus Sri Rajyalakshmi Agencies, Ramachandrapuram and others – Respondent For the Petitioner :-Mr.K.Chidambaram, Advocate. For the Respondent :- Mr.J.Sreenivasa Rao, Advocate. Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 15-Evidence Act, 872, Section 45- Expert opinion on signature – Validity of – Instant Case, Respondents filed the above suit for recovery of money based on certain transaction against the petitioners – One who is related to the petitioners has signed on several invoices and the same were filed into the court- Petitioners stating that the same are forged one – Respondents have filed the present applications seeking to send the disputed signature for expert opinion, for comparison of the same with his admitted signatures – Present revision against the same – Held, signature on a carbon copy of a document can be looked into for comparison as it is not a case of ascertaining the age of the document or ink – As the case of respondents is based on those invoices signed by a third party to suit who is admittedly related to petitioners, nothing wrong in the order passed to call him as a witness – It is for the court to decide to summon such third party as a witness or not. No merit in the contention raised by petitioners- Revision dismissed.

HANDWRITING EXPERT We, in the field of handwriting examination through our website Anil Gupta Forensic Services, also give training to the new experts who want to join the field of Forensic Science and Handwriting throughout India and abroad. Our Handwriting Expert, in the field of handwriting examination had given so many reports in different course of Law in India and our reports have been upheld by the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court as well as Hon’ble High Court at Jodhpur in Rajasthan regarding examination of handwriting on various documents. We, in the field of handwriting examination with regard to document to determine its age and nearby period of its execution depending upon the changes in the signature/handwriting present in the document under examination. We, in the field of handwriting examination, detect the forgeries and genuineness of the signatures/handwriting with latest techniques based upon Scientific Examination as per handwriting. Photo state copies are commonly used in the court proceedings and some time fraudulent photo state copies are prepared by transplanting handwriting /signature /thumb impression from one document to another document and forensic as well as handwriting expert are very help full in such cases who assist the court. Handwriting expert of our company in the field of handwriting as well as finger print appears before the courts to give evidence regarding the reports submitted in the courts and also face cross examination from the competent lawyers and other experts. We also detect the fraudulent photocopies and documents with regard to other defects present in the field of forensic science and handwriting examination and submit detail reports before the courts. Our company regarding their reports in forensic science and handwriting always cooperate with the clients and our handwriting expert always appears in the courts for statement and never put any client in problem and never disclose the contents of the case to other person and our company keeps the record of the client in secret manner. Our handwriting expert and forensic experts in the field of forensic science and handwriting never gives any dishonest opinions and never suggest any clients for such wrong opinions and always suggest the client to go before the court with clean hand as dishonest opinion will waste the money and time of the client as well as precious time of the court. Our handwriting expert in the field of handwriting examination also gives opinion regarding typewriting identification and identification of computer prints used in the court of law. Our handwriting expert in the field of forensic science and handwriting examination deals with the identification of the pen and ink which are sometime important to determine the genuine ore fraudulent nature of the document. Our company is registered wide enrolment no AOFE-001 and hopes to give best service in the field of forensic science and handwriting examination to the public and to assistthe court. Related Articles : Forensic Expert

2005(4) R.C.R.(Civil) 296: 2006(1) PLR 146 : 2006 AIR (Punjab) 39 : 2005(3) LJR 372 : 2006(1) CivCC 368 : 2005(2) HLR 736 : 2006(39) AIC 235 : 2006(1) HRR 220 Daljit Singh v. Sukhwinder Singh, (P&H) : Law Finder Doc Id # 85267 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURTBefore :- M.M. Kumar, J.Regular Second Appeal No. 1955 of 2005. D/d. 28.7.2005 Daljit Singh and others – AppellantsVersusSukhwinder Singh and others – Respondents “Furthermore, the defendant No. 1 has also examined DW-8 Shri Anil Kumar Gupta , Document Expert, who after comparing the thumb impressions of Harnam Kaur appearing on the above said sale deeds with her thumb impressions on the Will D-1 opined that the disputed thumb impressions on the Will Ex. D-1 and the standard thumb impressions appearing on the sale-deeds Ex. D-3 and Ex. DW-4/A are identical with each other and have been affixed by one and the same person. Having examined the report of the Expert DW-8 Anil Kumar Gupta , I do not find any reason to disbelieve the same. He also elaborated each and every point in his report Ex. DW8/A for forming his opinion. Thus, the opinion of this document export is a relevant piece of evidence and also proves the execution of the Will. Therefore, the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellants stand repelled”. It is further appropriate to mention that the document expert Anil Kumar Gupta DW-8 has also opined that the thumb impressions on the will are of one and the same person who had thumb marked the admitted document Ex. D-3 like sale-deeds Ex. D-3 and DW4/A. The argument with regard to document expert Anil Kumar Gupta cannot be accepted merely because in some other cases his credibility has been doubted.Therefore, there is no substance in the argument that the evidence of the expert was liable to be discarded.In view of the above, this appeal fails and the same is dismissed.Appeal dismissed.

h1>Forensic Expert Forensic Expert, Anil Gupta Forensic Services, Most often focused our attention on providing helpful genuinely valuable and honest opinions in Forensic Science, Finger Print Examination by our Forensic expert. Our main object is to provide best service in the field of Forensic Science, Handwriting and Finger Print to the public and our main aim is to assist the court regarding the problems of handwriting, Forensic Science and Finger Prints.     Our Forensic expert, in the field of Forensic Science, examines the document as a whole to find out its execution with regard to the effect that document was executed genuinely or not. Our Forensic expert examines the documents to find out material and fraudulent additions/alterations and also detect the erasing made in a fraudulent manner. We in the field of Forensic Science, our forensic expert examine the document to determine the age of the signatures by examining changes appears in the genuine signatures/handwriting of a person from time to time or due to some accidental reason. We, in the field of Finger Print Examination as part of Forensic Science, compared the thumb impressions to determine their genuineness or otherwise. We, in the field of Forensic Science, also make voice analysis identification which is also used in the detection of crime. We, in the field of Forensic Science, also deal with the cross examinations of the expert giving opinion on ballistics and ammunitions. We, in the field of Forensic Science, also deal with the detailed cross examination to the experts giving opinion on Forensic Problems in Civil and Criminal Matters.     Forensic Science Examination Our reports in the field of Forensic Science and Handwriting have also been upheld in so many cases in Session Courts and Lower Courts. Our reports in Forensic Science examination are prepared with examination with latest techniques and reports are prepared in details. Our forensic expert prepared photographs of the Forensic Science Problems with digital photography and attached these photographs with the reports for demonstration purpose to the Hon’ble Courts which are highly helpful to assist the courts regarding handwriting and forensic Science problems. We, hope that new forensic expert in the field of Forensic Science examination will join our company to assist the courts and to help the public with the latest techniques. The forensic science is the object to examine the documents with application of scientific method and instrument to detect the problem in hand. The signatures, thumb impressions and problems relating to handwriting and forensic science are common in India, where private experts are required in the civil and criminal cases and their opinions are sought by the parties. We in the field of forensic science also deals and gives our  opinions in the field of serology ,toxicology, anthropology. Our company is registered wide enrolment no AOFE-001 and hopes to give best service in the field of forensic science and handwriting examination to the public and to assist the court.  

Punjab-Haryana High Court Dharam Singh vs Labh Singh And Ors on 17 July, 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CR No.1271 of 2016                  Date of Decision: 17.07.2017 Dharam  Singh                                  ……Petitioner                     Versus Labh Singh and others                            … Respondents CORAM:-HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH SIGNATURE/THUMB IMPRESSION CAN BE COMPARED FROM PHOTO COPY In view of observations made by this Court in Harbans Singh and others Vs. Jagir Singh and others, 2006(1) PLJ 84, the photocopy of the document can be subjected to expert opinion, if the signatures/thumb impressions appearing on the document are apparent. The best evidence available with the party cannot be shut out on the preposterous plea that the comparison cannot be made on the basis of photocopy of the document.

How Forensic Expert are providing better meaning to our life problems Are you in search of tricks that you can come along in your next trial either in courtroom or board to win it? Expecting for various approaches that you must keep in mind before hiring a Forensic Expert for your trial? Then given below are few points that are provided by Anil Gupta know him his a top reputed forensic expert and carried out his M.sc in forensic since from Punjab university had a decade of experience in the examination of questioned documents & photography from various reputed government institution in India.   Given below are few points that you must keep in mind before looking out for a Forensic Expert for yourself: What’s your Qualification? The first thing that you must keep in mind before starting your hunt for the best forensic expert is searching out the qualification and years of experience he has while carrying out his practices. If possible must search for his CV and collect as much as information about this work from the local people and also from the search engine. How Forensic Expert ensure his best expertise? The basic ability that makes a person expert in Forensic Science is that his capability of cross-examination of questioned documents that are put by either of the two parties on the day of trial. Thus they are well equipped with their expertise to find the comparison between the genuine and forgery signatures or same goes in case of thumb expression as well. Can they meet the deadline? According to Anil Sharma, the forensic expert is fully aware of techniques and computerised technologies that help them to mark very minute detail of the detail and come up with the exact result that may be had taken place on a particular incident. Thus they are pretty much sure about exactly they have up with to carry out the examination of signatures, thumb impressions, questioned document in the specific interval of time. Any conflicts related to the case? This is the most noticeable phenomenon that usually carried out when you are looking for a forensic expert for your case. You must have to ensure beforehand that will the expert can handle your case or not. In the simple word is he have any conflict related to the particular case for which he has not specialised or that is not at all his cup of tea. These were the few points provided by Anil Sharma that could ensure you to come up with the best help of a forensic expert at the time of your trial. Even you can seek many various services outside the courtroom as well that could help you if you are a detective by profession. And as the forensic science deal with the study that is related to advance computerised technology that it is very much reliable. As well as much efficient to the older techniques that were used in case of forgery of the legal document and also better prospect to deal with the detail of the human genome characterisation.