Punjab-Haryana High Court
Bhola Singh vs Leela Ram on 16 August, 2017
Civil Revision No.2113 of 2016 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.2113 of 2016
Date of Decision: 16.08.2017
BHOLA SINGH ……Petitioner
Vs
LEELA RAM ….Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
On one hand judgment-debtor has examined himself as AW-1 and one Jagdeep Singh as AW-2 in support of his case. The decree-holder has examined himself as DH-1 and one Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting and Finger Prints Expert as DH-2. The expert has opined that the signatures appearing on the alleged compromise are not that of the decree-holder. The executing Court has doubted the genuineness of the compromise in view of the fact that though the same was allegedly recorded during pendency of the execution, but still the same was not executed before the Court. [4]. In view of attending circumstances, I find no reason to differ with the observations made by the trial Court. This revision petition is accordingly dismissed.