Punjab-Haryana High Court
Harbhagwan vs Mona Ram on 19 January, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.M. NO.9601 C OF 2014 & R.S.A. NO.4134 OF 2014
DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 19, 2016
Harbhagwan …..Appellant
VERSUS
Mona Ram ….Respondent
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
the respondent-plaintiff had produced PW3 Anil Kumar Gupta, Handwriting and Finger Print Expert, who, on the basis of the admitted signatures on the written statement, affidavit and Vakalatnama, which have been treated to be as the standard signatures, while comparing with signatures on the entries, which were disputed by the appellant-defendant, proved/opined the same to be that of the appellant-defendant. Even in the lengthy cross-examination, nothing has come out, which would effect the veracity of the report given by said witness.
No substantial question of law is involved in the present appeal. Therefore, finding no merit in the present appeal, the same stands dismissed.
Since the main appeal stands dismissed, C.M. No. 9601 C of 2014 for staying the operation and execution of the impugned judgements and decree is also dismissed.