Punjab-Haryana High Court
Vijay Kumar Malhotra vs Sukhchain Singh & Ors on 12 October, 2017
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-10135 of 2017 Date of decision:12.10.2017
Vijay Kumar Malhotra …..Petitioner
vs.
Sukhchain Singh and others …..Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
Therefore, from the above, I find merit in the present petition and the same is allowed. Anil Kumar Gupta, Hand-writing Expert is allowed to be examined by the prosecution.
3 of 4 Cr. Misc. No.M-10135 of 2017 [4] However, it is made clear that only two effective opportunities will be given for examination by the trial Court qua this witness.
Punjab-Haryana High Court
The Punjab State Cooperative … vs M/S Lakhpat Rai Rice And General … on 6 February, 2020
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
RSA No. 9 of 2019 (O&M)
Date of Decision:6.2.2020
The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation
Limited
—Appellant
versus
M/s Lakhpat Rai Rice & General Mills and another
—Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
the respondents-defendants examined Anil Gupta, Handwriting and Finger Prints expert to say that affidavits Ex. P5 to P7 were not executed by Darshana Rani. Taking into consideration findings of the first Appellate Court, I do not find any reason to intervene in concurrent findings recorded by the courts.
For the foregoing reasons, finding no merit, the appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed in limine. As the appeal has been decided on 2 of 3 merits, application for condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is of academic relevance.